Apr. 11th, 2007

johnridley: (Default)
Just random typing here.

I was reading another journal and I got to thinking; there are people who push the car-free lifestyle as the ultimate in environmentalism. I haven't given it much thought, but a few things occurred to me while answering a post today.

The problem with being car-free is that it pretty much guarantees that you're almost strictly a consumer. One of the reasons I need a car because I like to make things and do my own work, and it's hard to get a dozen sheets of drywall, a few hundred 2x4s, a yard of gravel or a few dozen trees, on a bike or a bus. You can get all of that delivered, but that's just paying someone else to do your polluting for you.

I think in some respects there's a collision between trying to be more self-sufficient (less of a consumer) and being car-free.

Short of living in the woods and growing all your own food, zero-impact is IMHO a pipe dream. Even Amish and rainforest natives make an impact. Reducing car use and driving the smallest practical car for you makes sense and does good, but eliminating a car altogether, for those living in the US, has its own social and environmental downsides.

October 2025

S M T W T F S
   12 34
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Oct. 30th, 2025 02:15 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios