Astronomy

Aug. 21st, 2015 11:17 pm
johnridley: (antikythera)
I got my scope out for the first time in I don't even know how long. Years. There was a printout from 2005 in the eyepiece case, though I THINK it hasn't been that long.

My equipment needs attention. The chair I built many years ago, the prop strut on the back has come unglued. I'd actually like to build something a little better, I have some ideas though I'm going to see what's on the market first. I'd like something like a drummer's throne but hydraulic, and it should have more adjustment than that. With a 10" I don't need the range I did with the 15" scope. It'd be nice if there was some way to hold a sketch pad as well.

I also need better eyepiece holders, the Orion has one 2" hole and 4 or 5 1.25" ones - I'd prefer about 4 or more 2" holes, I'll put every 1.25" eyepiece into a 2" adapter and just leave it there.

I should remove the computer from the scope, I'm not at all interested in using it.

The rubber rings fell apart and came off the focus knobs but I don't care about that.

The scope was out of collimation but I pretty much fixed that before starting.

I REALLY REALLY need to build an eq platform for my scope. SO irritating having to manually track while I'm trying to sketch. I want to do a 3D printed parts set, using OpenSCAD, making it parametric so you can just type in your latitude and platform size and it'll print out a parts kit for you. Also need a quick and dirty stepper driver, probably base it on one of the tiny Arduinos, maybe even the Digispark (they're $2 each).

I should buy another copy of Turn Left - the one I have is the one with all 4 signatures on it (Guy, Dan Davis, Todd and Mary Lynn) so I probably shouldn't take it out in the dew very much.

I didn't do a ton, mainly just initial shakeout of the equipment. I did a few sketches. Started with a log page with a couple of sketch spots, but then printed some pages with just 3 sketch areas per page and a small notes area, after I remembered I'd rather sketch than write notes. I' posting them at this album on Google Photos.
johnridley: (astronomy)
And damn, is it cold out. 5*F isn't the best conditions to learn to use a new computer guidance system, especially since it uses an LCD screen, and after the first 3 minutes I couldn't read anything on it, as it side-scrolls and the LCD was frozen and it all just became a big blur.

It took 4 tries to get it aligned, the final one worked because I finally realized that it thought it was in Newark and changed it to Ann Arbor. This mount was sold to someone in NJ before me, the invoice with his name on it was still in the box. I'm not really bugged by that, since I got it for $25 less than anyplace else had it. I may write a letter to him and ask why he returned it.
johnridley: (astronomy)
Good news, the inexpensive $14 dovetail mount I bought from Orion fits the scope (after a trip to town to buy the proper screws and a little drilling and thread-chasing in one of the holes, and some time at the bench grinder to turn the 1" screw to a 7/8" screw). So I don't have to buy the $90 worth of parts Losmandy wanted to do the same thing. They are correct, this bar wouldn't have fit the original scope, but the used tube that I bought had new holes drilled in it that exactly fit this bar.

And, the $12 power cable I got from Orion also works fine, and was a lot cheaper than the $25 cable from Celestron which AFAICT is the same thing. Though this scope has slots for a whole raftload of AA batteries, you really want to run this off a 12V external battery or a car socket; it destroys a set of AA alkalines in about 2 hours, and won't run off NiMHs due to the low voltage. Since I have a 12V jumper pack anyway, problem solved.

So here it is. Now I just need a clear and non-freezing day to make sure the thing works OK. I mean, it powers up and moves around, but I can't align it or test it without seeing the stars.


closeup of the dovetail bar )
johnridley: (555)
Everything showed up at once today. I got the blinkie boards and am quite happy with how they turned out, and both telescope equipment orders showed up today as well. Now I just have to see if I can get the telescope mounted on the dovetail rail and thence onto the mount.

I suppose if I'm snowed in tomorrow without internet service, I'll have something to do.
johnridley: (astronomy)
After paying bills this morning, I ordered the last major Astronomy bit - a base and tripod for the telescope tube that showed up last night. I got it from a place I'd never shopped before, Optics Planet, over in the Chicago area. I'm normally pretty careful about lowest price, but the video on their website led me to believe that they seemed like a legit company.

They had it in stock in their warehouse and had the lowest price and free shipping, they confirmed stock on the phone and I had a tracking number via email within an hour.

This will let me put all the pieces together next week, to make sure everything works with plenty of time to fiddle or get additional parts before it gets warm enough that I'm likely to want to use the thing much.
johnridley: (astronomy)
Since I had to jump on the used optical tube (he got another offer on it about 10 minutes after mine), and it's scheduled to be here via UPS on Thursday, and the sale price on the accessories I have decided ends Feb 10, and my primary financial goal will be met with Friday's paycheck AND I have cash in the bank to pay for it, I went ahead and ordered the eyepieces, power cable and dovetail plate that are on sale. It all came from an Amazon Marketplace seller (Orion) so I also get a 3% kickback on the Amazon Visa card.

Still not ordered is the tripod and computer base, but I won't order those until I get past payday, shake everything out and confirm that I can pay for it all with cash and still leave a reasonable cushion in the account.

Since I'm piecemealing this together, I want to get all the parts together within the next couple of weeks so that I am still within the return window if I need to exchange anything to get stuff working.

Once all this stuff is here, hopefully the new IRS schedules and forms will be out and I can figure out what I need to do between then and April 15. And I have to get started on financial goal #2, which will come with its own guidelines, yet to be defined.
johnridley: (astronomy)
I found out a week or so ago that you can buy just the tripod and computer base for the NexStar series without the optical assembly for $450 shipped. So I've been keeping an eye on the used market for optical tubes. Last night a very good looking 8" optical tube with the 2" diagonal that was on my "must buy" list anyway (and costs $125 alone) came up for $400 shipped. I do need to buy a dovetail bracket to mate the two together, so all together the scope, mount and bracket will be in the $910 range, but since these normally go for $1200 (and that's a historic low, 2 years ago they were selling for $1550 or so) plus $125 for the diagonal, I decided to go for it, given the $400 savings.

I'll probably hold off on getting the tripod and base for a little while, but I'll probably have the whole thing active by mid-spring.
johnridley: (astronomy)
I think I do want to get back into Astronomy, but since I've JUST paid off the credit cards, I think it would be more in keeping with my promises to myself to build up a reserve for a few months first, before I go spending over $1000. At least I want to be able to pay for vacations this summer without resorting to credit. AFTER that's covered, I'll think about it.

This means missing out on some sale prices, but I'll just live with it. Stuff will go on sale again.

So it's unlikely that I'll be bringing a telescope to Berzerker this year, if I even make it to Berzerker (I don't really know).
johnridley: (astronomy)
So, it having been about 10 years since I was actually in the market for a new telescope, and I haven't subscribed to any of the major astronomy magazines for about 6 years, I've been re-familiarizing myself with the market.
rambling of limited interest )
johnridley: (astronomy)
Now that I've cleared the astronomy plate - nearly every last bit of astronomy stuff sold, I'm starting to examine the reasons why, despite really enjoying astronomy, for the last 5 years or so I hardly ever actually did anything.

I think I will restart, this time I think with a computer driven 8" scope and a standardized, parfocal set of workhorse eyepieces. Modern 8" scopes on a computer alt-az mount are relatively inexpensive and very light and portable, and 8" is a pretty good size; big enough to get into a heck of a lot of deep sky objects besides the planets, small enough to easily carry in any car.

I was thinking about a 5", but after looking at video of setup on the new 8" scopes, particularly the Celestron 8se, I'm pretty convinced that they're even more portable and easy to use than before, and having been all over the spectrum now, I think that the 8" Celestron Schmidt that I had 10 years ago was probably the easiest to use and purely fun scope that I ever had. It wasn't computer guided at all, but it was fun. I think the computer will only add to it.

I'm going to wait until spring when I should be able to have money in hand to pay for it, and warm(ish) weather to use it in. That'll give me some time to think it over a few dozen times too.

In any case, it's about 1/3 the money I had tied up into it before, and a scope that's not only smaller, it's far faster to set up, and can be easily broken down and tucked into a corner.

I think selling everything and going back to zero was the move I had to make at this point, because it was hard for me to think in different directions when I already had about the "best" scope that I could imagine having in the direction I went in, and a modest, computerized Schmidt Cassegrain scope is, well, not 180* away, but more than 90.
johnridley: (astronomy)
I have a deposit on the telescope. I wound up letting it go for $2000, which is below parts cost, but I guess in the end I used it for 10 years and lost about $400, so I can't complain a lot. I do have to drive to Toledo at some point and deliver it and get the remainder of the cash for it.

This afternoon I shipped out my last couple of eyepieces and the laser collimator.

The only thing left is a somewhat bedraggled old eyepiece case and a cheap collimation tool, a couple of planispheres, a couple of maps and the two-volume "Night Sky Observer's Guide" which I am so impressed by that I haven't been able to let it go yet. I probably should though. If I get another telescope it will be small and that book set is mainly good for 8 inch and up scopes.

Yeah, I guess I may as well list it tonight. It'll just sit there otherwise.
johnridley: (astronomy)
I've sold every bit of astronomy equipment that I own other than the telescope itself, and I've dropped the price on that to $2000, which is honestly less than I paid for the parts. If it doesn't go at that price, I may start to part it out. The mirror itself ran $1600 10 years ago and there's a 4 month backorder time, so if anyone is in the market for that mirror it should go, especially if I throw in the mirror cell for free - it's an 18 point stainless steel flotation cell that I built myself.

What it comes down to is, I feel like I've seen all the easy and medium stuff like 80 times already, and the size of scope that I have kind of calls for looking for faint stuff, and I'm kind of sick of searching for faint stuff, especially as the light pollution here at home gets steadily worse. And even when I find it, it's not particularly inspiring, and I've proven to myself that I can find anything that's findable in these skies, so there's not any thrill left in that either.

Interestingly enough, when I admitted all this to my friend at work who I've thought of as a real astronomy hard-core, he said he feels exactly the same way. He's seen it all and the effort isn't worth the payoff anymore, and he's about ready to sell all his stuff too.

I've decided to clear everything out, give it a few months or a year or two, and see how my feelings go. Right now I think that even if I do get back in, a simple 4.5 or 6" reflector with a modest $250 or so set of matched, parfocal eyepieces would be just fine. Really I like looking at planets and the moon as well as anything, and I've gotten nice views out of a $200, 4.5" "beginner's" dob with simple, inexpensive eyepieces. I think for < $500 I can get a scope and eyepieces that will give me just as much enjoyment, and have a scope I can carry under one arm.
johnridley: (Astronomy)
In the next year, I'd like to:
- Observe some minor planets. I've never done this before. Pallas and Pluto would be good. I don't think Ceres is observable from where I am in the next year.
- Finish the Messier list - there are a few stragglers.
- Sketch more of the Messier list - I doubt I'll finish the list anytime soon but I could get farther.
- Make an effort on the Herschel 400 list. I think I'm stalled at around 100 objects. I need to move all my observing logs into SkyTools 3 in order to figure out what to do next.
johnridley: (Default)
I took my 15" dob to Berzerker, so of course it was overcast the whole weekend.
And while I can't complain too much about a summer where it never got truly uncomfortably warm, August through October is typically a great time to get the scope out as the nights get longer and the bugs get less numerous. But Clear Sky Clock continues to read lousy transparency and seeing, even on days when it's not totally clouded out. I haven't had the scope out more than once in the last year, and it's kind of a shame to leave a nice instrument like that gathering dust.

Maybe I need to switch to asteroids instead of galaxies; been thinking about that anyway. Asteroids I could see through bad seeing.
johnridley: (Astronomy)
The sky is relatively clear tonight, so in prep for having the new camera at Berzerker, I took a few long exposure frames. An 8 minute exposure was just silly, the sky was completely white, and the corner of the frame with the garage in it looked like a badly overexposed image taken in daylight.

I tried to do some star trails, but even at 2 minutes the sky glow was getting bad so I won't be able to do any good star trails from this location (unless I get a lucky break and the power goes out over a wide area and the skies are clear at the same time - this unfortunately rarely happens - power failures are usually associated with cloudy skies).

So anyway, here's a 10 second exposure at ISO 1600, f/4.5. First, a 300% crop of Alcor/Mizar - yes, I can see some elongation of Mizar indicating the close double, and even a bit of a blob between the two and to one side, closer to Alcor, which is Sidus. Pretty impressive considering I took a wild, half-blind attempt at manual focusing by pointing at a neighbor's porch light. These are with the 18-55 kit lens, btw.



Here's the full frame. Click on it to go to the album for a larger version.
johnridley: (Astronomy)
I got the mirror cleaned. Damn, it was filthy. Also I chased a lot of cobwebs out. It still needs some work but it's at least usable and still a damn fine instrument. I should do some work on the elevation bearings, I never got them quite right, just good enough.

I found it interesting that I can see more stuff in the SPOTTING SCOPE of the 15" than I can with the Astroscan, even though the spotting scope is just an 8x50mm, and the Astroscan is a 4.25".

The notes are here.
johnridley: (Astronomy)
First time in TWO YEARS I've had a telescope out.

I wound up using the little Astroscan. It's not bad for what it is, but 1/12 the light gathering of my "normal" 15" scope, it's really hard to get excited about it. Also it's a very wide angle scope, and even with a 5mm eyepiece, I can't get much magnification out of it. And my eyepieces are mostly so large and heavy that it's hard to use the scope with them; it just nosedives.

observing report here
johnridley: (Astronomy)
It's been over a year since I touched my telescope. This is kind of embarrassing, since it's quite a nice scope and to leave it unused for so long is a shame.

Anyway, I lost my Skytools logs in the drive crash earlier in the year. I still have the ones on the website, but I figured with as long as it's been for some of them, I might as well start over on the Herschel 400 list.

Today's targets: NGCs 7004, 6866 and 6834. I went for a galaxy as well but left it too long and the moon was up, so no chance at all. Even the PN was a little tough with the moon, the neighbor's lights, and the cars driving by.

Eventually the moon forced me in but I expected that. Just for the heck of it I tagged M57, 56, 92 and 13 with the scope, then the double cluster and a few double stars with the binoculars before going in.
johnridley: (Astronomy)
Rotten pictures, but oh well. Here's a collage (so cliché). Obviously the exposure is different on the last frame.
johnridley: (Default)
I got out with the scope for the first time in a LONG time. I have had it out for a few minutes at a time only a couple of times this year. I am running rather low on sleep so I still was only out for an hour or so, but even so it was good to get out.
I finally got around to reading about this mysterious "barlowed laser" collimation method, and used it this evening; it's brilliant. Dropping the laser collimator into a barlow lens totally eliminates type 2 misalignment from being a factor in the final collimation. It made me smile when I saw it working.
So anyway I saw some really good pinpoint faint stars that popped into being only at critical focus, which to me indicates that the collimation is pretty much spot on.
Anyway, going to start a couple of video encode jobs and get off to bed.

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 1234 56
7891011 1213
141516 17181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 3rd, 2026 12:45 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios